<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | traindabrain's blog posts</title>
<link>http://traindabrain.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>traindabrain's recent blog posts on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:21:36 -0700</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:28:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/traindabrain/blog" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:54:22 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[http://traindabrain.stumbleupon.com/review/18669430/]]></title>
<link>http://traindabrain.stumbleupon.com/review/18669430/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://traindabrain.stumbleupon.com/review/18669430/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Today I was wondering if determining prophet status is the process of reviewing the log books of crazy talk, picking the one that best matches history (from crazy talk start date to current) and then removing all references to other crazies (in case the review process made a mistake somehow).<br />
<br />
I mean, if you were compiling a book of short stories and needed a couple prophet characters, wouldn't make sense that if you were sincerely pursuing truth, you would want a prophet review board(PRB)?]]></description>
<comments>http://traindabrain.stumbleupon.com/review/18669430/</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
