<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | namzezam's URL reviews</title>
<link>http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>namzezam's recent URL reviews on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:47:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/namzezam/reviews" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:06:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>ComComism Blog: Comcom For Activists Or An Open Letter To Mitch Stewart</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2sb1Vi/comcom.wikidot.com/comcom-for-activists-or-an-open-letter-to-mitch-stewart/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/38144347/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "When you want NO-WAR, its really never matter who do you vote for."</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/comcom.wikidot.com/comcom-for-activists-or-an-open-letter-to-mitch-stewart</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:13:30 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith ComCom GovComCom: Our 55 Structure is How we make the IsWith-Platform as one Framework for all ComCom to evolve</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2ykHSK/is-with.wikidot.com/our-55-structure/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/34649633/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "IsWith-Platform pdf."    <br />
try it here <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to//is-with.wikidot.com/local--files/our-55-structure/IsWith%20platform.pdf/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:syndicate" rel="nofollow" target="_new">http://is-with.wikidot.com/local--files/our-55-structure/IsWith%20platform.pdf</a> <br />
<br />
see this Discussion in su: Is ComComism the new 3rd way?: <br />
<br /> <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to//left-liberals.group.stumbleupon.com/forum/109943/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:syndicate" rel="nofollow" target="_new">http://left-liberals.group.stumbleupon.com/forum/109943/</a> </p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/is-with.wikidot.com/our-55-structure</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:37:55 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>9/11 Coincidences (Part Two)</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2OUtZ2/www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7BSt9jhxPQ/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/20507185/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><b><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8683">The argument maneuvers of the nist</a></b> and <br />
<b><a rel="nofollow" href="http://911research.wtc7.net/materials/wtc/twintowers.html">The argument is this</a></b>: Free fall speed indicates no resistance below the falling object. No such resistance of each falling floor indicates that always from top to bottom, the floor below the falling floor had been previously and completely destroyed. All that had been emerged in less than 15 seconds per each of the <b>3 towers</b> known to be pretty high. This argument may sum up with <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related">controlled demolition</a>. If you know other ways to explain this phenomena, please let me and any other know your arguments, untill then please add to this argument that more than 6 years the commercial together with the political domains successfully let this free fall speed argument be ignored but led us to believe in what is already proven to be false (i.e. the Iraq association with Al qaeda associated with 9/11 attack).<br />
<br />
Ok, so now you may try the complete version of the free falling speed argument see the 9/11: The Case for Controlled Demolition <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4biSy4-mxs">here it was and not surprisingly the big-google-brother help to its dispersing while reducing my pagerank from 4 to 0</a> (with some collective evidence of the absent and the failure of so called "our collective democratic society").</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.youtube.com/watch%253Fv%253Di7BSt9jhxPQ</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:30:59 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith - ComCom: The 6 points defining what a Common Company is (where t*d=v*c or i*d=n*c)</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/Agm2n9/iswith.wikidot.com/common-company-in-6-points/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/25422292/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "The choice to form/join/interact-with ComCom over the Private ones is also a political, social and environmental one, since<br />
<br />
    * The more d and c are bigger the more the Common Dependencies in the company are effective and its structure tend to be more stable ;<br />
    * The more of the market is of ComCom of which d is bigger the less the ownership over the market CAN EVEN BE centralized.<br />
    * The centralization of ownership over the market enable only few to achieve any benefit from<br />
          o increasing corruption scales everywhere in the globe<br />
          o the measure for health of economy being the increase of consumption fueling the claimant changes by human.<br />
          o War and Foreign affairs benefiting land owning"    <br />
<br />
From the page: "It is time to admit that our well trusted specialists in economy were so deadly wrong to measure the health of any economy heavily/mainly by its growth and regardless the quality of distribution of wealth in it!"    <br />
<br />
From the page: "How exactly ComComizing can be used to solve the mortgage crisis ?" Faq, Q 3!</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/iswith.wikidot.com/common-company-in-6-points</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:29:29 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith - ComCom: ComCom - in its wider context: (still) Own what You share, as bigger is the d and in addition to the have, the want and the can</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1RDZix/iswith.wikidot.com/comcom-wide-context/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/34905957/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "The choice to form/join/interact-with ComCom over the Private ones is also a political, social and environmental one, since<br />
<br />
    * The more d and c are bigger the more the Common Dependencies in the company are effective and its structure tend to be more stable ;<br />
    * The more of the market is of ComCom of which d is bigger the less the ownership over the market CAN EVEN BE centralized.<br />
    * The centralization of ownership over the market enable only few to achieve any benefit from<br />
          o increasing corruption scales everywhere in the globe<br />
          o the measure for health of economy being the increase of consumption fueling the claimant changes by human.<br />
          o War and Foreign affairs benefiting land owning"</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/iswith.wikidot.com/comcom-wide-context</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:30:30 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith ComCom GovComCom: ComComism is the new 3rd way beyond the old Capitalism and any of the known systems of representatives acting for equal members!</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/5xIXao/is-with.wikidot.com/comcomism/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/34533620/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "the new 3rd way"</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/is-with.wikidot.com/comcomism</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:28:47 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith - ComCom: The mission of IsWith LTD is developing the ComCom market</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1CoCtI/iswith.wikidot.com/iswith-mission/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/34533581/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>The mission of IsWith LTD is developing the ComCom market</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/iswith.wikidot.com/iswith-mission</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:16:43 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith - ComCom: For Whom Is The Knowledge Making Profit</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2e3JBP/iswith.wikidot.com/for-whom-is-the-knowledge-making-profit/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/24747049/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>about The argument of The Cathedral and the Bazaar made by esr,<br />
<br />
For Whom Is The Knowledge Making Profit?</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/iswith.wikidot.com/for-whom-is-the-knowledge-making-profit</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:13:26 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>IsWith - ComCom: Developers Can Own The Comcom Business Having The Openness They Desire</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/5riu9U/iswith.wikidot.com/developers-can-own-the-comcom-business-having-the-openness-they-desire/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/27854147/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "Developers Can Own The Comcom Business Having The Openness They Desire "</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/iswith.wikidot.com/developers-can-own-the-comcom-business-having-the-openness-they-desire</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:39:15 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>ComComism Blog: ComComism and the flyers we are using to spread it in the street</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1WPiFL/comcom.wikidot.com/t:4b3560bb0e0bb;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://namzezam.stumbleupon.com/review/34342471/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: "ComComism is the new 3rd way between the old Capitalism and Communism... "</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/comcom.wikidot.com/</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
