<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | metally79's URL reviews</title>
<link>http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>metally79's recent URL reviews on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:34:13 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:59:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/metally79/reviews" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Biblical anti-Obama slogan: Use of Psalm 109:8 funny or sinister? / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2gzh4s/www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1116/biblical-anti-obama-slogan-use-of-psalm-1098-funny-or-sinister/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38582276/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>I had to look it up, but if people are just referencing Psalms 109:8 then they just mean that one phrase.  If they are also referencing 109:9 then ok...then you can be suspicious of their true motives for using it.  109:8 simply suggests that people only want him to have one term...not that they want him dead.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1116/biblical-anti-obama-slogan-use-of-psalm-1098-funny-or-sinister</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:53:26 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>HOT CHOCOLATE ON A STICK recipe | giverslog.com</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2oUgEM/giverslog.com/?p=3290/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38415371/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>I think I may try these this Christmas season.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/giverslog.com/%253Fp%253D3290</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Nothing For Ungood  &amp; Blog Archive   &amp; Germans wonder why Americans think of Bavaria when they think of Germany</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1sSTDb/nothingforungood.com/2008/05/15/germans-wonder-why-americans-think-of-bavaria-when-they-think-of-germany/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38373597/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>I am good friends with a family of Germans that live here and they also assume that everyone immediately thinks of Bavarians when they think of Germans.  I actually don&#039;t picture Bavarians whenever I think of Germans and never did.  With that said, I do  agree with the reasons Bavaria might appeal to us.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/nothingforungood.com/2008/05/15/germans-wonder-why-americans-think-of-bavaria-when-they-think-of-germany/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/153801</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2mJUKI/www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/153801/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38342447/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Extremely fucked up situation</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/153801</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:44:13 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Official StumbleUpon Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/6R5cyJ/stumbleupon.com/sublog/v4outofbeta/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38266329/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>I don&#039;t understand why you refuse to listen to the users!!!  WE DON&#039;T LIKE BETA....I REPEAT....WE DON&#039;T LIKE BETA.  In fact, WE HATE BETA.<br />
FU SU!<br />
<br />
The new design is hideous and there are less options!  I really liked the fact that SU was NOT a typical social networking site...I don&#039;t have a facebook account and I refuse to create one.  SU WAS great because it was all about information.  I actually MADE friends because of our similar interests.  If I wanted to talk to someone I already knew I would...that isn&#039;t what people use SU for.  How many people are going to leave SU all together?  Do you care?  It doesn&#039;t seem like it.  You know all those lists on the internet of has beens or companies that made shitty decisions that led to the downfall of the company...well I think it is safe to say that this change will ensure that SU ends up on one of those lists.  So thanks for the last 2 or so years.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/stumbleupon.com/sublog/v4outofbeta/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>More Hollywood Bullshit! &amp;171; </title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/5iL9KS/clipcritics.com/everything-we-post/uncategorized/more-hollywood-bullshit/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38230070/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://clipcritics.com/everything-we-post/uncategorized/more-hollywood-bullshit"><img border="0" width="207" height="155" src="http://ts.vimeo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/154/667/15466791_200.jpg" /></a>    <br />
<br />
It appears the SyFy Channel has ripped off an idea that was pitched to them by the folks at <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/4jFQUv/clipcritics.com/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:syndicate" rel="nofollow" target="_new">http://www.clipcritics.com</a>   That is just downright rotten and I hope they decide to sue the SyFy Channel.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/clipcritics.com/everything-we-post/uncategorized/more-hollywood-bullshit</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Sam Adams Utopia: Rare $150 Beer Is 27 Percent Alcohol</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2n59XI/www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/01/sam-adams-utopia-rare-150_n_374997.html/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38188146/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>"The drink comes in a ceramic-and-copper bottle that resembles a tiny brew kettle. Thirteen states prohibit its sale because its alcohol content exceeds the legal limit for beer: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Washington."  <br />
<br />
What a bunch of bullshit...and of course GA banned it.  I am all about states creating laws that fit the citizens of their state, but I don&#039;t think that laws made to ban certain beers or determine alcohol content is a worthwhile or reasonable use of government.<br />
Heaven forbid that the government NOT tell an individual what they can and cannot put into their own bodies...that would just create choas, right?</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/01/sam-adams-utopia-rare-150_n_374997.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:23:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Ron Paul 2012</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2nV6QN/www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php?Senator-DeMint-Blocks-Bernanke-for-Vote-on-Audit-the-Fed-2805/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38187605/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Just a little while ago, it was announced that Senator DeMint, who is the lead Senate cosponsor of Audit the Fed, has put a "hold" on Bernanke&#039;s confirmation for a second term as Federal Reserve chairman until S. 604 receives an up or down vote on the Senate floor.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php%253FSenator-DeMint-Blocks-Bernanke-for-Vote-on-Audit-the-Fed-2805</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:27:06 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091606s.gif</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2sbUJI/www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091606s.gif/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38186329/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091606s.gif"><img border="0" width="600" height="260" src="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091606s.gif" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091606s.gif</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:13:21 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Wide release for &quot;The Road&quot; Petition</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2KyuGh/www.petitiononline.com/WIDEROAD/petition.html/t:4b33b425dfb48;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metally79.stumbleupon.com/review/38124292/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>The Road looks like an awesome movie and has great reviews, the only problem is that they only released it to a few theatres with no plans of a wide release.  You can&#039;t complain that no one is going to see your movie if you don&#039;t distribute it outside of CA or NY!</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.petitiononline.com/WIDEROAD/petition.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
