StumbleUpon | gridsmashervet's comments & reviews

ERIK M. ASHERs Page - GUNBOOK

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:50:38 -0700

MY PAGE

Loris Latest: Informed Citizen News

Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:45:12 -0700

From the page: "http://www.glennbeck.com"

Watch Firefly Online - Full Episodes of Firefly & More TV Shows Online with blinkx Remote

Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:38:46 -0700

From the page: "Gina Torres"

Taurus Big-Bore Double Feature

Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:22:02 -0700

From the page: "Taurus PT845 25-Yard Accuracy
Factory Load Velocity (fps) Standard Deviation (fps) 25-Yard Accuracy (in.)

.45 ACP, 4.0-Inch Barrel
Speer 185-gr. Gold Dot 1088 14 2.88
Winchester 185-gr. Silvertip 939 10 2.75
Hornady 200-gr. TAP CQ 943 14 2.83
Remington 23-gr. BJHP 886 21 3.12
Winchester 230-gr. SXT/HP 913 17 2.68
NOTES: Accuracy is the average of five, five-shot groups fired from a sandbag benchrest at 25 yards. Velocity is the average of five rounds measured 10 feet from the gun's muzzle."

30 Little Known Facts about America

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:33:37 -0700

From the page: "1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914
6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above)
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178) 10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)
11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. (Get the Disks)
12. The UN is a One World Super Government. (Get the Disks)
13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. (Get the Disks)
14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)
15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)
16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)
17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)
19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24) 20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)
25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)
26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
28. The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)
29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y

Freedom Fighter Radio.net | FEMA DEATH CAMPS AND THE RED AND BLUE LIST UNDER MARTIAL LAW

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:57:43 -0700

From the page: "�oeFEMA RED-BLUE LIST” Marked For TERMINATION

FEMA DEATHCAMPS AND THE RED AND BLUE LIST UNDER MARTIAL LAW

Pam Schuffert
AmericanHolocaust.homestead.com
07/11/2008 19:55:31

While I have no doubt that the NWO-cravers at the CIA have their OWN list of people to round up and terminate (don�t you, boys?) the actual proper agency behind the now-infamous �oeRED/BLUE LISTS” is none other than �oeFREDDY FEMA AND HIS BLACK OPS BOYZ.”

FEMA is NOT here to primarily HELP YOU. Under a full state of MARTIAL LAW, FEMA is here to send you to their DETENTION CAMPS to sort out WHO SHALL lIVE AND WHO SHALL DIE.

Those unfortunates whose names are found among the MILLIONS OF FELLOW AMERICANS on FEMA RED/BLUE LISTS will never come out of the FEMA CAMPS alive, although they may have to go through hell before they are finally terminated.

Such �oeoffenders” are essentially deemed RESISTERS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER, as my CIA and military insiders told me personally.

�oeOh, ALL OF US in the CIA know ALL ABOUT the concentration camps in America and their purpose! We ALL KNOW that their purpose is to TERMINATE �RESISTERS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER� UNDER MARTIAL LAW!” (Source-Michael Maholy, 20 years Naval Intelligence/CIA under BUSH SR)

For example, THE FEMA DEATH CAMP OF THE MOJAVE is a full gassing/cremating DEATH CAMP, dedicated to the TERMINATION OF ALL ON FEMA�S RED/BLUE LIST UNDER MARTIAL LAW.

I have previously documented this horrific death camp, and documented the eyewitness accounts of several former NWO supporters who were flown out there.

My friends, DOC MARQUIS (Illuminati) and ELAINE KNOST (CIA/Luciferian), formerly high level Illuminati Luciferians but now Christians for many years, were both flown separately to this facility in the Mojave Desert of California. It boasts a landing strip.

According to another contact, a DEA agent who personally investigated this FEMA facility, it was recently DOUBLED IN SIZE TO INCREASE KILLING CAPACITY. It is fully staffed. All staff members WEAR BLACK SWAT TEAM UNIFORMS.

When I asked Doc Marquis what his sentiments were, back when he was a member of the Illuminati and given a tour of this killing facility, his reply was, �oeSHEER JOY! I REJOICED at the thought of CHRISTIANS BEING TERMINATED IN THIS PLACE!”

A chilling response, but typical of this nation�s Satanists and NWO supporters!

This FEMA death camp was shown off as something the NWO and FEMA was literally PROUD OF!!!

And there are MANY more FEMA detention camps whose ultimate purpose under MARTIAL LAW is NOT TO SAVE LIFE, but to TERMINATE HUMAN LIVES DEEEMED UNWORTHY OF ENTERING INTO THE DAWNING OF LUCIFER�S NEW WORLD ORDER.

KNOW THE COLD HARD FACTS ABOUT FEMA!

And then think TWICE before going meekly to such camps under a STATE OF MARTIAL LAW in YOUR region.

FEMA Body Containers

Apparently all contingencies are being taken care of.

Photographers snapped pictures of an estimated half a million plastic coffins in Georgia

More Fema Coffins in Ennis, Texas

More Fema Coffins in Afton, Wyoming

We are all on a Red or Blue list somewhere, those on the red list will be woken at 4am and taken to the camps and probably killed.

Red List - These people are the enemies of the NWO. They are the leaders of patriot groups, outspoken ministers, outspoken talk show hosts, community leaders, and even probably NET leaders. These people will be dragged out of their homes at 4:00 am and will be taken to FEMA detention centers and killed. This will take place approximately 2 weeks before martial law is enforced.

Blue List - these are also enemies of the NWO, but are followers of the Red List folks. These people will be rounded up after martial law is in place, and will be taken to the detention centers and �re-educated�. Various mind-control techniques will used on them. Most will not survive this. Mr. Springmeier was not specific on exactly who was on the Blue List, but I would guess that people such as you and I are on that list.

Yellow List - these are citizens who know nothing about the NWO and don�t want to know. They are considered to be no threat at all and will be instructed as to how to behave and will most likely do whatever they are told. Unfortunately there are too many of these to be effectively controlled, so many will be killed or starved and many will have their organs harvested.

Scary stuff, but hey, we all have to go sometime."

http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/mainpics/3333694.jpg

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:03:16 -0700

Sign In to Off The Grid - Off The Grid

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:03:20 -0700

From the page: "magine a crop that could be planted and harvested in approximately 90 -120 days depending on climate, without the expense and environmental impact of pesticides and fungicides, without the soil degradation of rotational crops, requiring less water than all major U.S. grown crops, and that could produce an oil to run our cars and paint our houses, and soothe our dry skin. Further, imagine a crop that would produce seeds that have no rival as an edible source of protein and essential fatty acids (omega 6/omega 3), and would help us reduce our cholesterol levels. Many of us now know that this crop exists. Some even know that this crop can be grown also for elegant paper, clothing, composite board, super-absorbent animal bedding, shampoo, mulch, insulation, and ice cream. But it is fiber, luscious fiber, that this crop is less known for and for which it seems to be least understood.

For starters, hemp can't be grown for both fiber and seed during the same harvest. The rich fiber must be cultivated before it produces seed, usually in 90 days or less. A good crop will yield rich long bast fiber that has legendary strength and endurance; a fact not lost on generations long departed. One might contend that the British navy would not have dominated the seas for centuries without their hemp fiber sails or that Meriwether Lewis or William Clark might have inadvertently allowed their intrepid crew to drift aimlessly down the Missouri without their hemp fiber ropes to steel against the strong current. Today, however, hemp has taken on even greater importance as a fiber. As textile jobbers and mills struggle to differentiate their fabrics and their environmental stewardship from other �oegreen” textile companies, few have investigated the seed, crop, and agricultural aspects of their product. At a time when textile and carpet producers are turning headlong to corn as the new renewable fiber of the future despite its invasive and devastating growing practices, hemp remains the prom king that missed the dance. How many understand that soil erosion and nutrient run-off from over reliance on pesticides are consequences of dangerous monocrop farming practices? Do any recognize that water tables worldwide are falling at unsustainable rates due to the heavy toll of irrigation? Additionally, the recycling of polyester and nylon into fiber is not a long-term answer, either. Barbara Filippone, founder of Enviro Textiles, a successful developer and importer of Chinese hemp fabrics, suggests, �oeRecycling is only a temporary solution for what we don't know how to dispose of, while a sustainable and biodegradable approach will save the health of our planet for future generations.”

It is the perfect harmony with nature that makes hemp one of Earth's oldest crops dating back thousands of years to China . When a bounty crop can be grown with deep roots to strengthen the topsoil, be watered half as much as other crops due to its super absorption, and grow naturally without pesticides as a result of its weed-like performance shading out all other competing plants, why is it fettered by nearsighted policies? In a superpower industrial juggernaut like the United States why are our small farmers relying on subsidies, not products, to maintain their culture? Well, for one, small farmers don't make up much of the farming population. (Our 2 million farms in the U.S. represent 2 % of the population.) The main reason is the recent Farm Bill. At the current figure of 248 billion dollars, these farm conglomerates can rely on subsidies to supplement the artificial dollar value of corn, barley, oats, beans, wheat, etc. In our state, North Carolina , the subsidies for tobacco farmers highlight an even stranger scenario for farmers: subsidies for not growing their crop. As a result of the recent legislation against tobacco companies, North Carolina tobacco farmers are being compensated by means of the fine levied against those tobacco companies whether they grow anything or not. Capitalism has no roots in modern agriculture, to say the least!

The primary reason why U.S. farmers can't grow a cash crop like hemp is obvious; it is illegal to grow hemp domestically. The ban was created in 1937 because of the government's indifference to the distinctions between hemp and its cousin, marijuana. Considered an illegal substance because of its THC, the psychoactive ingredient found in the cannabis species, hemp has been forever banished as a crop. Despite its miniscule THC percentage of less than 1% (marijuana has 15% or higher) hemp has not returned to American farms. Of course there was that time when the government needed a strong, absorbent fiber for blankets to keep our soldiers warm overseas in WWII. Since 1970, the enforcement of the ban has fallen on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. It is responsible for preventing hemp crops, and up until recently the ingestion of the seed. It is widely known throughout the DEA t

The Obligation to Be Obnoxious

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:42:52 -0700

From the page: "The civilized person in each of us wants to be polite and kind to other people. We tend to answer people when they ask us something, and do little things if someone asks (i.e., holding the door for someone, letting someone pull into traffic in front of us, etc.). We've also been trained to respect and obey "authority." So when someone in "law enforcement" asks someone a question, or asks to be allowed to check something, or search somewhere, most people instantly and unthinkingly comply. After all, if you're one of the good guys, why wouldn't you cooperate with the police?

Well, I'm here to tell you, good people have an obligation to refuse to "cooperate" with authoritarians, as much as possible, even when "cooperating" would be easy and apparently harmless, and even when refusing to cooperate feels rude and pointless.

The reason for this is simple. Whatever intrusions, interrogations, stops, searches, and other inconveniences you will voluntarily submit yourself to, you are implicitly telling the thugs posing as "authority" that they have the right to demand such things of you. And when everyone does that, the police start expecting it, and start seeing it as criminal when someone does not "volunteer" to be harassed, detained, interrogated and searched. (Go to any airport in the country if you need proof of that.)

Consider the occasional random traffic stops that are done across the country (including right in front of my house). The cops stop everyone, ask if they've been drinking, where they're going, and some other things, and shine a flashlight around in their cars to look for possible evidence of crime. Just about everyone quietly submits, thinking that's what a good person would do.

It's not. Politely cooperating amounts to giving your blessing to the thugs of "authority" stomping on the Fourth and Fifth amendments. When their victims don't resist, or don't at least politely object, it teaches the state's mercenaries that treating people like that is perfectly fine, and teaches them that anyone who does not like to be treated like a criminal must be a criminal. (How's that for ironic?) In case you think that's an exaggeration, consider the fact that the federal fascists, in their own memos, have listed the following as possible indications that someone is a domestic terrorist: the person might "request authority for [a police] stop," or might "make numerous references to [the] U.S. Constitution," or might "attempt to 'police the police'." Here is the FBI's own memo saying that:

http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer.jpg
http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer2.jpg

So now asking why a cop stopped you, or invoking your Constitutional rights, or keeping an eye on the local cops to see if they're behaving properly, are signs that you're a criminal, or even a terrorist?! How did this country ever come to that? Simple. With every new infringement on individual liberty, most people decided to quietly go along with it. They thought it was the good thing to do. As a result, the people have come to think like slaves, and their oppressors have come to think like slave-masters. And every time you are polite and cooperative with someone in "law enforcement" when he is doing something unjustified and unconstitutional (which is most of the time), you are adding to the problem. Yes, you might make less trouble for yourselves today, but you are also building the police state that your kids are going to have to live in. (Try asking some people who lived in 1940's Germany whether, in the long run, quietly going along with whatever "law enforcement" said is really a good idea.)

If, on the other hand, you refuse to talk to those in "law enforcement," refuse to consent to any search, demand to know why a cop stopped you, and what justification he has for inconveniencing you at all, it's a safe bet that the cops won't like you. They might even make trouble for you. But they will also know, for all their thuggery and self-importance, that they are not your masters, and never will be. Sure, they still have the ability to taser you, beat you up, even kill you. The point is, if you grovel, say "yes, officer," and comply with their every whim, they don't need to do any of those other things, because you are already their slave.

And it's a safe bet that if you do those things yourself, you are also training your children to be slaves as well. If you wouldn't sell your kids into slavery, why would you donate them into slavery? If you're too much of a coward to resist tyranny for your own sake, at least think of what you are training your children to be. Instead of teaching them to unquestioningly bow to "authority," I have a better idea: teach your kids that they own themselves, and that they are not the property of the state. (For starters, you could have them read "The Iron Web.")

"

Freedom Fighter Radio.net | H.R. 675: Building Obama's Civilian National Security Force

Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:15:22 -0700

From the page: "In January, without any recognizable corporate media coverage, Rep. Bob Filner, a California Democrat, introduced H.R. 675. The bill would amend title 10 of the United States Code and extend to civilian employees of the Department of Defense the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. The bill was referred to the Armed Services Committee on January 26, 2009.

Filner�s bill would amend the United States code with the following: �oeSec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms… for any offense against the United States.” (Emphasis added.)

The Posse Comitatus Act, passed on June 18, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, limits the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits members of the federal uniformed services from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain �oelaw and order” on non-federal property within the United States.

H.R. 675 sidesteps Posse Comitatus by defining �oelaw enforcement officer of the Department of Defense” as �oea civilian employee of the Department of Defense,” including federal police officers, detectives, criminal investigators, special agents, and game law enforcement officers classified by the Office of Personnel Management Occupational Series 0083 (the United States Office of Personnel Management is described as an �oeindependent agency” of the U.S. government that manages the civil service of the federal government).

In 2005, the Office of Personnel Management partnered with the Department of Homeland Security to create a �oe21st century human resources management system that fully supports the Department�s vital mission,” according to then Office of Personnel Management Associate Director for Strategic Human Resources Policy Ron Sanders.

At approximately the same time, the DoD issued a Defense Directive 1404.10 (read PDF) that establishes a �oeDoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce” and rescinds a prior Clinton era directive dealing with the emergency use of civilian personnel. The Obama administration describes the Civilian Expeditionary Workforce as follows:

Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05

�oeThis new directive is odd, coming as it does after campaign promises by Obama to establish a paramilitary �civilian national security force that�s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded� as our military,” writes Doug Ross.

According to Sec. Def. Robert Gates, defeating terrorism will require the use of more �oesoft power,” with civilians contributing more in communication, economic assistance, political development and other non-military areas. �oeGates called for the creation of new government organizations, including a permanent group of civilian experts with a wide range of expertise who could be sent abroad on short notice as a supplement to U.S. military efforts. And he urged more involvement by university and other private experts,” the Associated Press reported in late 2007.

It should be noted that the original Civilian Expeditionary Workforce directive mentions the term �oeoverseas” no fewer than 33 times, while the Obama revision does not mention �oeoverseas” at all. In other words, the revised directive is designed for �oeemergency operations” in the United States.

Both H.R. 675 and the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce directive will establish civilian �oesoft power” under the direction of the Pentagon. Obama is now actively working to create a paramilitary �oecivilian national security force that�s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the military. In order to skirt Posse Comitatus, Obama�s paramilitary brownshirts will be organized and run out of the Office of Personnel Management with orders coming from the Pentagon.

In the recent past, the Pentagon sent operatives to snoop on anti-war and patriot demonstrations �" for instance, Alex Jones� protest at the Federal Reserve was monitored by the Pentagon . In the not too distant future they will likely send �oecivilians” with firearms and the power to arrest �oerightwing extremists” who represent, according to the Department of Homeland Security and numerous federalized police agencies, �oeoffense against the United States.” "