<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | caivp's URL reviews</title>
<link>http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>caivp's recent URL reviews on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:30:23 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:43:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/caivp/reviews" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2009/2/3/our-wild-west-politics</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2AwimC/caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2009/2/3/our-wild-west-politics/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/29885712/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Finally, someone recognizes that things are pretty bad here -- bad to the point where business as usual doesn&#039;t work. Too bad the politicians can&#039;t come to a similar realization and stop the sniping. The furloughs are estimated to save $1.3 billion over the next year and a half, an amount that teeters toward the chump-change side of .....</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2009/2/3/our-wild-west-politics</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:58:01 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/article/proposition-1/2008/11/3/prop-1a-california-cant-even-sell-bonds-it-already-authorized</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1HxIXm/www.caivp.org/article/proposition-1/2008/11/3/prop-1a-california-cant-even-sell-bonds-it-already-authorized/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27148595/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>The fact that opponents of abortion are so demoralized as to introduce a sad sack of a bill like Proposition 4 is surely evidence of a fundamental problem with the Pro-Life cause...</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/article/proposition-1/2008/11/3/prop-1a-california-cant-even-sell-bonds-it-already-authorized</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:50:51 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/article/campaign-finance-reform/2008/11/4/morning-links-nov-4-2008</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/6yxjL6/www.caivp.org/article/campaign-finance-reform/2008/11/4/morning-links-nov-4-2008/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27148381/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>American flag at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial<br />
<br />
SD UT: Probable Record Turnout on Election Day<br />
<br />
SFChron: What will happen to those already married if Prop. 8 passes?<br />
<br />
LA Daily News: Authorities On Alert for Prop. 8-Related Incidents<br />
<br />
SFChron: &#039;A Lot at Stake&#039; in California<br />
<br />
SFChron: San Francisco Budget- From Bad to Worse<br />
<br />
SFChron: 13.6 Million Californians Expected to Vote<br />
<br />
LATimes: Skelton- Prop. 12 &#039;Pays For Itself&#039;<br />
<br />
LATimes: Polls Show Prop. 4 is Close<br />
<br />
LATimes: Schwarzenegger Stands With Bi-Partisan Coalition Against Prop. 5</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/article/campaign-finance-reform/2008/11/4/morning-links-nov-4-2008</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:38:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/article/proposition-11/2008/11/4/saving-people-themselves</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/30GNPh/www.caivp.org/article/proposition-11/2008/11/4/saving-people-themselves/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27148057/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>"Democracy" has become a fetish in American political discourse. People complain constantly that particular Presidents/legislators/judges/dog catchers follow policies which are unfriendly to "Democracy"...</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/article/proposition-11/2008/11/4/saving-people-themselves</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:47:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2008/10/24/no-taxation-without-speculation</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/Anu5mv/www.caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2008/10/24/no-taxation-without-speculation/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27117981/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Conventional political sentiment tells us that we are either for a particular proposition, or against it. We are told to support Proposition 8 if we believe in traditional marriage, or against if we believe in equality. What about those who believe that a government authority empowered by a simple majority, should not have the authority to tell dissenters that they have to share the majority&#039;s proclaimed moral virtues?</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/article/tax-reform/2008/10/24/no-taxation-without-speculation</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-8/2008/10/1/proposition-8-eliminates-right-same-sex-couples-marry</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/A7KP7B/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-8/2008/10/1/proposition-8-eliminates-right-same-sex-couples-marry/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27117664/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Proposition 8 is a Constitutional amendment initiative that eliminates the right of same-sex couples to marry within the state. Defines marriage as only between one man and one woman. The proposition is a reaction to a May 2008 Supreme Court ruling that struck down a 2000 law that restricted same sex couples from marriage under the equal protection clause of the California Constitution.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-8/2008/10/1/proposition-8-eliminates-right-same-sex-couples-marry</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:24:46 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-5/2008/10/1/proposition-5-nonviolent-drug-offenses-sentencing-parole-and-re</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1JAXbX/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-5/2008/10/1/proposition-5-nonviolent-drug-offenses-sentencing-parole-and-re/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27117357/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>This complex initiative has five parts to it. First, it would expand treatment programs to drug offenders both in prison and out of prison. Second, its passage would modify parole-shortening it for some offenders, those who have typically committed nonviolent and few to no other offenses; in contrast, parole is increased for violent criminals.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-5/2008/10/1/proposition-5-nonviolent-drug-offenses-sentencing-parole-and-re</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-4/2008/10/1/proposition-4-abortion-and-parental-notification</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1YIT5Z/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-4/2008/10/1/proposition-4-abortion-and-parental-notification/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27117125/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>At this time, if a girl under the age of 18 who is not legally married is currently serving in the United States armed forces, or has not been legally declared free from her parents&#039; or guardians&#039; custody and control seeks an abortion, she must wait at least forty-eight hours for an abortion. In that time, a physician, assumably the one that would perform said abortion, or his/her legal representative must notify the parent or guardian of the girl seeking the operation.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-4/2008/10/1/proposition-4-abortion-and-parental-notification</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:09:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-3/2008/10/1/proposition-3-children%E2%80%99s-hospitals-bond-act</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2xBrJE/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-3/2008/10/1/proposition-3-children%E2%80%99s-hospitals-bond-act/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27116914/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Proposition 3 authorizes the sale of $980,000,000 in bonds, which will be guaranteed by the State General Fund, for the purpose of granting funds to California&#039;s 13 children&#039;s hospitals. These grants would be paid over 30 years in amounts of $64,000,000/year. These grants will go to both public and private children&#039;s hospitals; 80 percent of them will go to private hospitals while 20 percent will go to public, University of California hospitals.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-3/2008/10/1/proposition-3-children%2525E2%252580%252599s-hospitals-bond-act</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:05:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-2/2008/10/1/proposition-2-standards-confining-farm-animals</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2foOjp/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-2/2008/10/1/proposition-2-standards-confining-farm-animals/t:4afb10cf09934;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://caivp.stumbleupon.com/review/27116765/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>Proposition 2 is a measure that prohibits the on-farm confinement of calves raised for veal, pregnant pigs, and egg-laying hens in a manner that does not allow said animals to exhibit a natural range of motion, that is, allows them to lie down, stand up, turn around freely, and be able to fully extend their limbs. The new mandates won&#039;t take effect until January 1, 2015. Certain exceptions are made for veterinary, transportation and lawful slaughter purposes. Violation of the proposed law will result in a misdemeanor charge punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or imprisonment in county jail for up to six months.</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.caivp.org/propositions/proposition-2/2008/10/1/proposition-2-standards-confining-farm-animals</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
