<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | applznorngz's comments &#38; reviews</title>
<link>http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>applznorngz's recent comments &#38; reviews on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:35:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/applznorngz/comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Eric Clapton &amp;Buddy Guy - Sweet Home Chicago</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/31zixQ/www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmEBTUbaWjA/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37381420/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: LightSkyBlue; font-family: Verdana; color: SaddleBrown;" size="3">Heading over to Chicago for a few days... Will returned refreshed and ready to stumble... (ha!)&nbsp; See you around!</font><font style="font-family: Verdana;" size="3"><br style="font-weight: bold; background-color: LightSkyBlue; color: Magenta;" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font><font style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana;" size="3"> Chris &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</font><font style="background-color: SkyBlue; font-family: Verdana;" size="3"><font style="background-color: LightSkyBlue;"> &nbsp;</font> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.youtube.com/watch%253Fv%253DfmEBTUbaWjA</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>The order by which people are admitted to heaven // Notre Dame Magazine // University of Notre Dame</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/A8uRV7/magazine.nd.edu/news/12213/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37399511/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font style="font-weight: bold;">Am re-upping my membership in the Unitarians...</font><br /></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/magazine.nd.edu/news/12213</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Sarah Palin&amp;s intervention backfires for Republicans | People in the News | People | The First Post</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2kJ0Qb/www.thefirstpost.co.uk/55579,people,news,sarah-palins-intervention-backfires-for-republicans?DCMP=NLC-daily/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37398142/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font class="dropcap">f.p.:&nbsp; "S</font>o much for Sarah Palin<br />
and the plans to rebuild the Republican party in her image. The former<br />
vice-presidential candidateâ€s intervention in the choosing of a<br />
candidate for yesterdayâ€s special congressional election in northern<br />
New York state has backfired. As a result, the staunch conservative Douglas L Hoffman, backed by<br />
  Palin and other right-wingers including the TV personalities Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, had to concede defeat this morning to Democrat Bill<br />
  Owens.<br />
"<br /><br />Yes!  Yes! Yes!    <br />oh, I know, this means nothing, and I am still very very concerned that the Conservatives will make their comeback before we Liberals even have a chance to put a dent in their Insidious Plan to Destroy the World...  and of course, as slow moving as we are, not much has happened yet.<br />But, still.  Yes!</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.thefirstpost.co.uk/55579%252Cpeople%252Cnews%252Csarah-palins-intervention-backfires-for-republicans%253FDCMP%253DNLC-daily</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>Kate Winslet libel win strikes blow for normal women against Daily Mail | Entertainment | People | The First Post</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/21zMMT/www.thefirstpost.co.uk/55549,people,entertainment,kate-winslet-libel-win-strikes-blow-for-normal-women-against-daily-mail?DCMP=NLC-daily/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37397285/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>From the page: <font style="font-weight: bold;">"The reporter disputed Winslet&#039;s claim that her "enviable muscle tone" was simply the result of doing Pilates workouts at home for 20 minutes every day and suggested she was still "going for the burn" with regular exercise. The article was accompanied by naked photos of Winslet in various film roles, intended to illustrate the writer&#039;s point. "</font><br />ummm, excuse me? 20 mins of Pilates a day is NOT regular exercise??? Whoa, am I ever out of the running. <br style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Courier New;" /><font style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Courier New;">She so pretty though.&nbsp; Did you ever see the movie "Romance and Cigarettes"?&nbsp; She can be raw, but she was So raw!&nbsp; Funny.&nbsp; Plus the movie was enough to make my friend quit smoking (cigarettes).</font><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/55549,people,entertainment,kate-winslet-libel-win-strikes-blow-for-normal-women-against-daily-mail?DCMP=NLC-daily"><img src="http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/assets/library/winslet--125725205524767100.jpg" border="0" height="312" width="426" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.thefirstpost.co.uk/55549%252Cpeople%252Centertainment%252Ckate-winslet-libel-win-strikes-blow-for-normal-women-against-daily-mail%253FDCMP%253DNLC-daily</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>CharlesHBs reviews - StumbleUpon</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/1oWdCa/charleshb.stumbleupon.com/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37397056/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font size="3"><font style="font-family: Georgia; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Charles is "my Hero".&nbsp;</font></font> <font size="3"><br /><br />Because he gives the most sensible and erudite comments on Get Satisfaction.</font><br /></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/charleshb.stumbleupon.com/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:37:20 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>   Sex abuse rife in other religions, says Vatican |    World news |    The Guardian </title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/9dSdqe/www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/28/sex-abuse-religion-vatican/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37396571/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font style="font-style: italic; color: Fuchsia; font-weight: bold;" size="3">The<br />
statement, read out by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican&#039;s<br />
permanent observer to the UN, defended its record by claiming that<br />
"available research" showed that only 1.5%-5% of Catholic clergy were<br />
involved in child sex abuse.<br /><br style="color: Black;" /><font style="color: Black;">I would have felt better had the statistic been oh, .0015% - .0005%...&nbsp; damned themselves with faint praise.</font><br /></font></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/28/sex-abuse-religion-vatican</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>ShirlTs blog - StumbleUpon</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2mRquH/shirlt.stumbleupon.com/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37394901/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p>A good way to start the morning... laughing...&nbsp; Thanks, Shirl...<br /></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/shirlt.stumbleupon.com/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<title>TornerÃ²... &amp; johnny84 weblog</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/76ChmX/johnny84.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/tornero/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37394610/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://johnny84.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/tornero/"><img border="0" width="376" height="489" src="http://johnny84.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/brb.jpg?w=376&h=489" /></a><br />
Enjoyed visiting his pages</p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/johnny84.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/tornero/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:45:06 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>Paid Stumble Campaigns? // Blogging Help // BlogCatalog</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/3uiZOD/www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/paid-stumble-campaigns/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37292254/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font style="font-weight: bold;">Thumbed up for interest.  A blog for stumblers who do it for advertising.  It was an interesting discussion and I didn&#039;t even follow all of it.  I did learn that when you stumble the same sites over and over, you devalue your own???  Don&#039;t know if I understood that right either, however, it would explain why I have more limited traffic???  I like to go back to my friends and revisit...    Or did it mean that if you thumbs-up the same site over and over That is what causes the negative for you?  I don&#039;t know and don&#039;t really care...  just this little blurb that I found seems to signal what is going on:</font><br />From Page :&nbsp;&nbsp; "I am sorry - but when it comes to Stumble and what it is being used for<br />
at this point... you are in a very small group of people. Stumble like<br />
most social network sites are used for and promoted as<br />
"traffic-drivers" - yes they may have been born of higher and mightier<br />
ideas - but in the end - that is what it is. It is what Stumble is,<br />
Digg is, BC is and and and. Yes, I have definitely found some great<br />
sites and reads on Stumble, Digg and BC - But in the end - I can find<br />
just as many by using a "random blog" feature on Word Press or Blogger,<br />
without all the "socialism." I have made some good friends and some<br />
good business contacts because of the interaction and because of the<br />
"teamwork" that promoting each other involves."<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I do not see this as any kind of&nbsp; nefarious plot... rather just the inevitable outcome of the invention of Social Networks... as long as we remain Capitalist (which I am not against, in this case) <font style="font-weight: bold;">and with freedom of expression.</font>&nbsp; I only want SU to still leave a place for us little peons who actually keep the system going, to have the same freedoms.&nbsp; <font style="font-weight: bold;">Hopefully, that is how it will work out...</font><br /></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/paid-stumble-campaigns</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:10:03 -0700</pubDate>
	<title>http://www.merrilyfanciful.com/comics/2008-08-04-shotgun.png</title>
	<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/2j7DmE/www.merrilyfanciful.com/comics/2008-08-04-shotgun.png/t:4af68cabeb057;src:reviews</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://applznorngz.stumbleupon.com/review/37271325/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><img src="http://www.merrilyfanciful.com/comics/2008-08-04-shotgun.png" /><br /><br />I&#039;m EXTREMELY aware of the changes coming to SU.<br /><br />I will miss what seem to be small things, but they are what shape our<br /><br />blogs and how we can tell what other stumblers are about.&nbsp; For<br /><br />instance:&nbsp; * I like to know how long a person has been on SU, it tells<br /><br />a lot about the quality type of stumbles if I know if they&#039;re just<br /><br />starting out, or if this is their on-going style.&nbsp; * I&#039;d like to be<br /><br />able to choose to go to everyone&#039;s review first.&nbsp; These are the things<br /><br />I look at when deciding if I&#039;ll subscribe to someone&#039;s site.&nbsp; *I&#039;d like<br /><br />to know how many visitors I&#039;ve had the minute I come onto my blog so I<br /><br />can race over and see who&#039;s been there.&nbsp; *I&#039;d like to be able to "blog"<br /><br />without stumbling.&nbsp; (I&#039;d be willing to give that up, I can usually find<br /><br />an applicable site to compliment what I want to say.)&nbsp; *I&#039;d like to<br /><br />have more choices of color background, particularly in lighter shades<br /><br />of greys and neutrals.<br /><br /><br />On the plus side, as I&#039;m tripping back and forth between 3 and 4, I do<br /><br />think that the new way of showing the public profile is an improvement<br /><br />over 3. (Meaning favorites, reviews, subscribers, subscriptions,<br /><br />reviews of you... just add how long they&#039;ve been stumbling.)<br /><br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp; Originally, SU encouraged us to subscribe to other stumbler&#039;s sites...<br /><br />If the personalization is gone, why would we bother...We can just push<br /><br />the stumble button to infinity and get sites that are often what we are<br /><br />interested in.&nbsp; Without developing relationships among stumblers where<br /><br />is the fun of SU?&nbsp; It might as well be DIGG or delicious...<br /><br /><br />Other media sites like Digg and Reddit have the ability to collect info<br /><br />and even share to a certain extent.&nbsp; But Stumble alone combines site<br /><br />collections with easy social connections.&nbsp; By being able to see each<br /><br />others sites, we can see if we have common interests.&nbsp; Stumble still<br /><br />somewhat stumbles by algorithms that are helpful.&nbsp; But, even more, I<br /><br />can visit subscribers and friends to see what they have found that&#039;s<br /><br />new and pertinent or even just serendipitous.&nbsp; <br /><br /><br />"When observing the hundreds of social media websites that exist,<br /><br />StumbleUpon sets itself apart from the crowd by being completely<br /><br />unique. While many other sites use a cookie-cutter approach,<br /><br />StumbleUpon is truly unlike any other social media site. That unique<br /><br />approach is part of what makes it so attractive to users and<br /><br />marketers."&nbsp; I don&#039;t know who to attribute that quote to, but it sums<br /><br />up my feelings about SU and is why I feel actual sadness to see the<br /><br />ability to personalize being winnowed away and actually discouraged.&nbsp;<br /><br />Reminds me of, oh, making your own granola, then some little health<br /><br />food store starts selling their version, and that&#039;s great, makes it<br /><br />easier, more standardized (original SU) then Kelloggs or General Mills<br /><br />buys their recipe and starts marketing on a large scale and then,<br /><br />pretty soon, out go the dates, in goes more sugar...&nbsp; You know...&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><br />Probably inevitable to go for bigger not better, but I really never<br /><br />found anything wrong with the original Stumble version...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; THAT<br /><br />was Exactly What I Was Looking For.&nbsp; boohoo.&nbsp; But that doesn&#039;t fit in<br /><br />this world, and we have to face that we are Not the majority of<br /><br />stumblers, as the staff keeps reminding.<br /><br /><br />For now, I&#039;m going to try to minimize my frustration and continue to<br /><br />socialize and stumble for as long as the socializing part is still here.<br /></p>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.merrilyfanciful.com/comics/2008-08-04-shotgun.png</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
