<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Wires's blog posts</title>
<link>http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/</link>
<description>Wires's recent blog posts on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:06:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/user/Wires/blog" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:33:47 -0700</pubDate>
	<title><![CDATA[http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/]]></title>
	<link>http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font size="4">Postscript III (Or the Achievement Rand Length and an Acknowledgement of Egotistical Realization)</font><br />
I am a caricaturist by natal appointment (or holy punishment), hyperbolizing unfavorable reds (monosyllabic at that!) to flamboyant sanguines. If you input the dimensions of 4cm by 4cm, I will output 4m by 4m. Multiplication of monotony isn't necessarily equivalent to the materialization of magnificence but not mathematically inclined a slight, it is the formula I exploit. Obscurity is my security, an adherent of the philosophy what they don't know I cannot blow. Exhibit 1: A) I complicate without cognizance. B) Baroque artistry I exclaim, the subconscious spontaneity of Pollock I became. A) is the bullshit, b) is the decoration of the bullshit to contain its resemblance to bullshit. The more my vernacular appears like an arbitrary arrangement of alphabets, the better.</p>
		<div>
			<a href="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/" alt="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/"><img title="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/" src="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/nomthumb.png" border="0" /></a>
		</div>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/</comments>
</item>
<item>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 04:33:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<title><![CDATA[http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/]]></title>
	<link>http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[
		<p><font size="4">Postscript II (Or How to Conveniently Achieve Rand Length and Simultaneously Avoid Egotistical Realization)</font><br />
I abhor poetry (exceptions rare). Therefore I am not a poet. Therefore do not brand me a poet. I dig hip pop. Mozart, Schubert, Chopin, Dvo&#345;ák and the classical collective, I dig too and would happily dig, out of their graves. Diacritics are decorative delights. Modern English rejects diacritics, thus it is inartistic. But it still embraces peculiar pronunciations, thus it must be artistic. Artistic is synonymous with la-di-da. Any gibberish recognized as a word is Sapphire approved diction.<br />
<br />
(Repost because Stumbleupon swallowed the first and its ailing digestive system couldn't identify the toxin.)<br />
<br />
<a target="_new" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to//wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8534728/t:4afa70cc6c87a;src:blog">Postscript III</a></p>
		<div>
			<a href="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/" alt="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/"><img title="http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/" src="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/nomthumb.png" border="0" /></a>
		</div>
	]]></description>
	<comments>http://Wires.stumbleupon.com/review/8479509/</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
