StumbleUpon | Jackanapes's comments & reviews

Michael Barone: Tuesdays Biggest Loser: the Union Agenda - WSJ.com

Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:21:49 -0800

From the page: In the election results and the exit polls there are clear signs that the Obama majority coalition has splintered.

Obama still has a chance to move to the center and stop this madness. If he does move to the center then there is a good chance that Obama will not be a one term president.

Satyagrahas favorite websites - StumbleUpon

Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:27:02 -0800

Satyagraha says: "War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength."

Is this some postmodern truth for you brother? Your sermon seems to contradict the law of contradiction. Atheists must love to show how logically incoherent they are. This pleases me so keep up the good work.

The liberal elitist buffoonery gets better.

Edit: I forgot that people like you are not well read. This is a famous quote from George Orwell's "1984". We can add plagiarism to your super intelligent truthyness. I am familiar with the though police you embody. I used it because your comments clearly show a mind that's thoroughly confused by dogma and poisoned by modern day attempts to ignore and suppress several thousand years of... I feel sorry for you, and hope that you one day will release yourself from the murky thought-prison you have confined yourself to. I bet you fancy yourself to have actually used logic when you confined yourself to the worship of science and an empirically sanitized box free of God. It's a pity to see such self refuting paradox flaunted so blindly. Hopefully this is just a phase you will grow out of.

Here is some help: http://www.atheism-analyzed.net/

In the meantime, ask yourself why bright people thumb down your blog.

Ask yourself why only the ankle biting trolls are the ones posting their vituperation? I note that the more intelligent ideologues are not inclined to pettiness or negative reviews as method of attention seeking.

You continue to please me even more.

TheSupremeCourts blog - StumbleUpon

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:18:56 -0800

A fallacious world view must give you the ideation that you have a right to pass judgment on others. Where are you borrowing your morals from?

Oh.. right! this one thinks it's the Supreme Court! roflbbq

don't cease to pontificate my atheist brother as it pleases me...

Collecting Words

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:00:01 -0800

something a garrulous jackanapes might like for a more turgid prose

Ananova - Cat and dog share childcare

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:37:09 -0800

mass hysteria!

That's Gay: Gayngels // Current

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:26:44 -0800

Here I gay to save the day!

Mighty Gay

teh gay is here to save you gurl so a little self deprecating satire is not too much umkay... settle down..

Obama Marriage in NYT Magazine, Michelle Obama in Glamour -- Politics Daily

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:01:06 -0800

From the page: "...their relationship, which is presumably at a high point because they are living under the same roof full time for the first time since 1996. "

Ahh.. The charm offensive is on! Let the media leg humping begin!

BarbaraCurtis.com

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:33:40 -0800

From the page: "Mother of 12
(and former radical leftist)
lives to write about it!"

Pajamas Media & Blogging Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: Prologue

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:00:19 -0800

From the page: "What stands out: The emptiness of atheism. The solipsistic response of the human heart where there is no God."

Challenging Religious Myths 2: Atheism is just another Religion & de-conversion

Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:34:40 -0800

From the page: "the only common denominators are a rejection of the supernatural as a force for organising[sic] their lives, and a lack of bodies trying to instill uniformity of belief or practice."

Ah if only this where the solid rock of truth.

Atheism is not just another religion but I question if it does not function for some as being like a religion. A sort of back door entry with fronts of denial and lots of obfuscations. How does one flesh out a system of no rules and free thinkers as entering religion by the back door? Well you start off by asking the atheist if they feel they are the correct and true actual way to view truth. Once you receive a preset talk of dogmatic obfuscations go on to ask if they need evidence for there own position. Is there evidence for Atheism validating atheism with evidence? You know the evidence question no atheist wants to answer.