http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.hokstad.com/rails-is-total-overkill-and-why-i-love-rack.html Comments & Reviews of http://www.hokstad.com/rails-is-total-overkill-and-why-i-love-rack.html on StumbleUpon en-us Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:41:15 -0700 Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:05:24 -0700 http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.hokstad.com/rails-is-total-overkill-and-why-i-love-rack.html http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/logo_su_36x36.png Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:41:56 -0700 http://vidarh.stumbleupon.com/review/19069882/ vidarh - From the page: "Rails is total overkill. It tries to do "everything" in a massive framework where major components are tightly intervowen. Smaller frameworks like Merb and Camping have already shown you don't NEED this. I argue you don't need a framework at all - you need highly cohesive, loosely coupled components. That is why I love Rack - it does one thing and does it well, and leave me to write applications, not learn frameworks."]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.hokstad.com/rails-is-total-overkill-and-why-i-love-rack.html