<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Simon Jenkins: As Burma dies, our macho invaders sit on their hands | Comment is free | The Guardian</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/14/burma.china</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/14/burma.china on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:40:23 -0700</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:20:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/14/burma.china" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:20:55 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://marymar.stumbleupon.com/review/21245272/</link>
<title>http://marymar.stumbleupon.com/review/21245272/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/373/20127373.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>marymar</b> - From the page: "What is sickening is the attempt to squeeze a decision not to help these desperate people into the same "liberal interventionist" ideology as validates billions of pounds on invading, occupying, destabilising, bombing and failing to pacify other peoples whose governments also did not invite intervention.

Offending national sovereignty is apparently fine when it involves oil, opium, Islam or a macho yearning to boast "regime change". It is not to be contemplated when it is just a matter of saving hundreds of thousands of lives."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/14/burma.china</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
