<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Johannes Keplers Polyhedra</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler.html</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler.html on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:39:02 -0700</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:47:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:58:15 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://j4m3sb0nd.stumbleupon.com/review/12064266/</link>
<title>http://j4m3sb0nd.stumbleupon.com/review/12064266/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/274/9448274.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>j4m3sb0nd</b> - <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler.html"><img border="0" width="286" height="274" src="http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/figs/kepler-spheres-2.jpg" /></a>

"The image above is a closeup of the spheres of inner planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars.  This is a beautiful astronomical model.   For example, it explains why there are only six planets:  How could there be a seventh planet, when Euclid proved that there are only five Platonic solids!  Of course, the model is completely false, the interplanetary distances it predicts are not sufficiently accurate, and Kepler was scientist enough to accept this eventually. But it is an excellent example of how truth and beauty are not always equivalent."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
