<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:39:39 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:44:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:17:59 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://amonthia.stumbleupon.com/review/24328161/</link>
<title>http://amonthia.stumbleupon.com/review/24328161/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>Amonthia</b> - Did you know that using classic lets you look into private beta pages?  That's just one reason not to suck the beta tailpipe.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://meekythegeek.stumbleupon.com/review/17699289/</link>
<title>http://meekythegeek.stumbleupon.com/review/17699289/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>meekythegeek</b> - I can't find the log on function on the new beta version :/  So I have to switch to the old to log out]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:29:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://digitalcomplex.stumbleupon.com/review/16251494/</link>
<title>http://digitalcomplex.stumbleupon.com/review/16251494/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>digitalcomplex</b> - Yeah, the new look pretty much sucks.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://megamanzx.stumbleupon.com/review/16072204/</link>
<title>http://megamanzx.stumbleupon.com/review/16072204/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>MegamanZX</b> - The old SU look is easier on my eyes]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 03:11:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://miguelstil.stumbleupon.com/review/15079005/</link>
<title>http://miguelstil.stumbleupon.com/review/15079005/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>miguelstil</b> - I don't miss the classic view at all!]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:30:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://drcs.stumbleupon.com/review/14224596/</link>
<title>http://drcs.stumbleupon.com/review/14224596/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>drcs</b> - Support for creating sustainable permaculture whereever you live.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:57:39 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://anudhyan.stumbleupon.com/review/13987599/</link>
<title>http://anudhyan.stumbleupon.com/review/13987599/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>Anudhyan</b> - I like the new layout. And its here to stay. If someone doesn't like it then they can use greasemonkey to code their new layout.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:18:11 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://ashes.stumbleupon.com/review/13511224/</link>
<title>http://ashes.stumbleupon.com/review/13511224/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>Ashes</b> - Whether I like the new layout or not is irrelevant. It's not really something I want to stumble upon.<br /><br />On that note however... It may be because I'm really an oldie here by now but yeah, I like the old school look of SU.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:47:23 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://charleshb.stumbleupon.com/review/13107487/</link>
<title>http://charleshb.stumbleupon.com/review/13107487/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>CharlesHB</b> - I'm sorry I'm sad the way stumble has been changing, first there was the stalkers, then the spammers, ok SU was a victim of it's success, as it grew, it grew less geeky, more mainstream, and a bigger sample of people meant more bad eggs; that I could deal with, then the came the sale to ebay, props to the dev's they have every right to reap the fruits of their labours; but this new lay out... I don't dislike the look passionately; it's just so like so much else out there, but 'beauty' like this is only skin deep - to repeat the obvious stated here many times - it's overly complicated, and not intuitive... those who know me must have noticed my posts have dwindled, I guess SU isn't the site it once was]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:04:14 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://redshift13.stumbleupon.com/review/13090397/</link>
<title>http://redshift13.stumbleupon.com/review/13090397/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/193/13244193.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>redshift13</b> - It amazes me how many people at this late stage still don't understand elementary principles of good web site design.  The new SU design is so seemingly obviously a step backwards it defies belief that it got out of the planning stage.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stumbleupon.com/new_layout.php</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
