<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of   GlobalWarming.org&amp;|&amp;Climate Change News &amp; Analysis                </title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.globalwarming.org/ on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:17:27 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:00:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:35:21 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://generalcokehead.stumbleupon.com/review/34265469/</link>
<title>http://generalcokehead.stumbleupon.com/review/34265469/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>GeneralCokehead</b> - Seems a lot like this website is a conservative front group. The top 3 articles are exaggerated reports, and about the same subject.

In short: Horseshit.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:56:19 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://stuartginbey.stumbleupon.com/review/32512685/</link>
<title>http://stuartginbey.stumbleupon.com/review/32512685/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>stuartginbey</b> - Great site with plenty of content on Global Warming]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:58:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://wechtenkamp.stumbleupon.com/review/16002291/</link>
<title>http://wechtenkamp.stumbleupon.com/review/16002291/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>wechtenkamp</b> - At the bottom of the page: "This site is sponsored and produced by CEI". Contributors to CEI include:                                {Amoco Foundation Inc.... CSX Corporation..... Fieldstead and Co..... FMC Foundation..... Ford Motor Company Fund.... Philip Morris Companies Inc..... Pfizer Inc...... Precision Valve Corporation..... Texaco, Inc...... Texaco Foundation}

...........Source:
http://www.sourcewatch.org]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:52:23 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://nexon.stumbleupon.com/review/13385268/</link>
<title>http://nexon.stumbleupon.com/review/13385268/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>nexon</b> - OK, so rising temperatures cause increased atmospheric CO2... therefore CO2 is NOT a GreenHouse Gas?
<br />
I guess I don't understand that kind of "logic"]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:51:44 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://ru3ah.stumbleupon.com/review/8634300/</link>
<title>http://ru3ah.stumbleupon.com/review/8634300/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>ru3ah</b> - http://www.globalwarming.org/index.php  This band of idiots doesn't believe in glogal warming. Follow the money.
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/"><img border="0" width="410" height="175" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/images/1b2.gif" /></a>]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:26:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://lwd.stumbleupon.com/review/8300944/</link>
<title>http://lwd.stumbleupon.com/review/8300944/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>lwd</b> - Cooler Heads Coalition? No scientists in the coalition I notice, just people and groups concerned with promoting a "strong economy". Why do the words "vested interests" spring into to my mind....]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:18:17 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://elmomonster.stumbleupon.com/review/5762949/</link>
<title>http://elmomonster.stumbleupon.com/review/5762949/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/540/14540.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>elmomonster</b> - scaremongering environmentalist? what's to gain from that?  whenever I read anything I ask "who wrote this? why? who has something to gain from this?  who paid for it?"
regardless of whether you think global climate change as a result of co2 emissions is a major threat we can't rely on fossil fuels forever.  easier to plan ahead now than to wait until soaring enery prices devestate the fossil fuel addicted global economy.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.globalwarming.org</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
