<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Finding the Truth about Climate Change</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.climatepolice.com</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.climatepolice.com/ on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:31:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.climatepolice.com" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:15:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://woscafrench.stumbleupon.com/review/8194318/</link>
<title>http://woscafrench.stumbleupon.com/review/8194318/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/130/10297130.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>woscafrench</b> - It's depressing how effectively the debate has been blurred by those with vested interests to the extent that people can still think that there are two  legitimate sides to this argument, the debate ended years ago, where were you?]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.climatepolice.com</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://goinhome.stumbleupon.com/review/8193641/</link>
<title>http://goinhome.stumbleupon.com/review/8193641/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/130/10297130.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>goinhome</b> - I like to hear two sides of an argument before I create an opinion on any issue. Global warming is an issue, and no one can argue that fact. The argument, instead, centers on whether global warming is real or not (although I thought that issue was settled at the beginning of this year).

I distrust any media (because I work for this industry and I know how biased stories are generated and why), so both sides of this issue need scrutiny. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.climatepolice.com/" title="Climate Police">The Climate Police</a> provides one example where global warming problems are mitigated by some interesting documentation. I consider this documentation no more or less convincing than some of the media hysteria about global warming from the "we're going to die in 25 years" perspective.

What I do resent is reviews about the Climate Police, such as the one offered by <a rel="nofollow" title="Visit the News Buster site" href="http://newsbusters.org/node/11037">News Busters</a>. This site states that Climate Police is "nonpolitical." But when a site lists the story,"Gore to receive honorary doctorate in climatology," under the heading "humor," I tend to find that action extremely political.

And then there's personal bias. Since News Buster's mission is to become "the leader in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias," I tend to question anything that this site espouses, including (but not limited to) the Climate Police.

Thumbs up to staying close to your friends and even closer to your enemies.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.climatepolice.com</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
