http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Comments & Reviews of http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm on StumbleUpon en-us Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:06:57 -0800 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:46:48 -0700 http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/logo_su_36x36.png Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:46:48 -0700 http://mrchampion.stumbleupon.com/review/36938517/ MrChampion - Little more than unsubstantiated statements from an avowedly right wing internet rag]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:41:08 -0800 http://searchandlearn.stumbleupon.com/review/30053751/ SearchAndLearn - wikipedia please!]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:57:47 -0700 http://rr16.stumbleupon.com/review/23612559/ RR16 - From the page: "Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets. " Is this a new religion?]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:47:34 -0700 http://avangionq.stumbleupon.com/review/18841436/ AvangionQ - [REPEAT POST] All of this source information is from the 1970's ... needs to be updated ...]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:13:41 -0700 http://bransby.stumbleupon.com/review/13915910/ Bransby - From wikipedia: "People from over 130 countries contributed to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report over the previous 6 years. These people included more than 2500 scientific expert reviewers, more than 850 contributing authors, and more than 450 lead authors" The 4th review referred to above came to the conclusion that there is around a 90% chance that global warming is happening and is caused by humans. Entirely up to you of course, you can believe this one bloke who is, as far as can be told, a professor of climatology. Or you can believe thousands of his peers. Your call.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:08:30 -0700 http://guswfla.stumbleupon.com/review/8751572/ guswfla - Through bore-hole research, it's been discovered that global warming started about 1500 A.D. when man began clearing forests to plant crops. While it's likely that natural causes are contributing to the phenomenon, to not try to reduce man's contribution to global warming would be foolish.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:08:04 -0800 http://wespennest.stumbleupon.com/review/8336328/ Wespennest - Right next to "personal attacks have no place in science" is an ad making fun of Al Gore's weight. "WAAAH, WHY ARE YOU SO IMMATURE, YOU BIG FAT DUMB POOPY STINKY BUTT BRAINS?!"]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:21:46 -0800 http://skuzzbunny.stumbleupon.com/review/8245090/ skuzzbunny - please THINK rationally: all this SCIENTIST is saying is that there is a BIG difference between a SCIENTIFIC issue and a POLITICAL issue. "global warming" has become COMPLETELY politicised. the science of the issue has become completely irrelevant, as POLITICIANS are now in control of it, NOT the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. OF COURSE this needs to be researched and we should probably implement some interum precautions, but research does not happen when you already know the "right" answer!) this has happened before, folks. the more non-scientific people who do not understand the scientific method and what science really is all about that get involved with this thing, the stupider this will get. perhaps this current hysteria won't cause any great tragedies, but it will certainly cause much stupidity and inefficiency at least, and will be another blot on scientific history for decades to come. please, put this back in the hands of real scientists where it obviously belongs and let them do some serious research (yes, gasp, it will take some time, years of course! climate change takes mellenia folks.) before you throw some graphs together and flip everyone the hell out. peace.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:44:42 -0800 http://mrsa.stumbleupon.com/review/7848286/ MrsA - Global warming? Think again.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm