<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Are ad networks for loser/weak publishers? &amp; The Jason Calacanis Weblog</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.calacanis.com/2008/03/24/are-ad-networks-for-loser-weak-publishers</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://www.calacanis.com/2008/03/24/are-ad-networks-for-loser-weak-publishers/ on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:40:48 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:08:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/www.calacanis.com/2008/03/24/are-ad-networks-for-loser-weak-publishers" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:07:07 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://10kluke.stumbleupon.com/review/19118012/</link>
<title>http://10kluke.stumbleupon.com/review/19118012/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/497/18739497.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>10kluke</b> - This is a good article, although I'm not sure I agree 100%. Some ads (yeah punch the monkey) totally make me sick at the sight of them. There are way smarter ways to monetize than these ad networks. AdSense is one, but also I believe certain affiliate programs are worth joining.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.calacanis.com/2008/03/24/are-ad-networks-for-loser-weak-publishers</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:36:55 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://jasoncalacanis.stumbleupon.com/review/19109658/</link>
<title>http://jasoncalacanis.stumbleupon.com/review/19109658/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/497/18739497.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>jasoncalacanis</b> - Are ad networks for loser/weak publishers? my thoughts given ESPN dropping ad networks. thoughts?]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.calacanis.com/2008/03/24/are-ad-networks-for-loser-weak-publishers</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
