<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Bush Edits Out Jeffersons Religious Views : Dispatches from the Culture Wars</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:08:35 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:16:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:48:44 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://stevedtrm.stumbleupon.com/review/23191745/</link>
<title>http://stevedtrm.stumbleupon.com/review/23191745/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/110/21576110.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>stevedtrm</b> - From the page: "Jefferson made many such statements, of course. Clearly they are best edited out by those who advocate nothing if not monkish ignorance and superstition."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:28:18 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://avangionq.stumbleupon.com/review/23175388/</link>
<title>http://avangionq.stumbleupon.com/review/23175388/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/110/21576110.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>AvangionQ</b> - "May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government." - Thomas Jefferson ... an amazing quote towards equality, knowledge, small government and freedom from religious persecution -- admirable qualities that the Bush Administration have seem to have either forgotten or intentionally ignored ...]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:18:47 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://seasandcakes.stumbleupon.com/review/23164752/</link>
<title>http://seasandcakes.stumbleupon.com/review/23164752/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/110/21576110.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>seasandcakes</b> - That's a pretty good catch - Bush deliberately excludes the middle of a Jefferson quote, which sets up the entire quote's anti-religious meaning.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:55:58 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://msiegel.stumbleupon.com/review/23160089/</link>
<title>http://msiegel.stumbleupon.com/review/23160089/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/110/21576110.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>msiegel</b> - magnificent example of using a person's words for the *opposite* of what was intended... in this case, George W Bush vs Thomas Jefferson]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/bush_edits_out_jeffersons_reli.php</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
