http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Comments & Reviews of http://newhumanist.org.uk/1915 on StumbleUpon en-us Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:49:16 -0800 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:51:18 -0800 http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/logo_su_36x36.png Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:31:50 -0700 http://jayeshchill.stumbleupon.com/review/35909629/ jayeshchill - lol]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Fri, 01 May 2009 23:43:18 -0700 http://mikegreaves1.stumbleupon.com/review/32490909/ mikegreaves1 - really nice]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:20:23 -0700 http://flonkbob.stumbleupon.com/review/31005415/ flonkbob - I love these! I'm definitely going to print them out on good card stock and start playing at home. Wheeee!]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:48:32 -0800 http://jmichaeledwards.stumbleupon.com/review/30453516/ jMichaelEdwards - Nice :)]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:12:29 -0800 http://sustainablogger.stumbleupon.com/review/30449199/ sustainablogger - From the page: "Struggling to choose the top religion? Can't decide between Bible-thumping evangelism or benign, gentle Buddhism? Make the process fun and easy with God Trumps, our cut-out-and-keep metaphysical card game for all the family."]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:10:11 -0800 http://raindrop.stumbleupon.com/review/29849238/ raindrop - lol]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:42:45 -0800 http://thinkerific.stumbleupon.com/review/29618570/ thinkerific - Sacrifices a bit too many facts to be funny and shows a clear bias as to which religions are respected the most or least.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:38:07 -0800 http://pizzacica.stumbleupon.com/review/29496271/ pizzacica - I wanted to like it, but these fit too poorly and contain too many errors. "The Pope says jump, Catholics say how high": author deriving her knowledge on popists solely from 'The Da Vinci Code'? Not having ceremonial burial as 10/10 daffiest doctrine? The devagana as a singular deity? Branding Zoroastrianism as 1st monotheism while it wouldn't have been first even if it were a 'real' one? Confusing atheist 'doctrine' with that of, uh, I don't know, some sort of primitive anarchism perhaps? Passing by an opportunity for the vaunted sarcastic humour in favour of over-the-top preachiness on Muslim card? Shall I go on?]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:03:25 -0800 http://apologue.stumbleupon.com/review/29190278/ apologue - Idiotic. If they didn't have so obvious an agenda the cards could have been written in a funnier way.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/newhumanist.org.uk/1915