http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/hotair.com/archives/2008/03/14/saddam-supported-at-least-two-al-qaeda-groups-pentagon Comments & Reviews of http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/14/saddam-supported-at-least-two-al-qaeda-groups-pentagon/ on StumbleUpon en-us Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:55:08 -0800 Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:15:09 -0800 http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/hotair.com/archives/2008/03/14/saddam-supported-at-least-two-al-qaeda-groups-pentagon http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/images/logo_su_36x36.png Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:26:18 -0700 http://stumbleine33.stumbleupon.com/review/18782805/ Stumbleine33 - From the page: "Earlier this week, the Pentagon announced that an investigation into over 600,000 documents captured at the end of the invasion of Iraq showed no operational links to al-Qaeda â€" or at least, thatâ€s how the media reported it. After a strange few days in which the Pentagon delayed the report, it finally hit the internet last night â€" and itâ€s clear that the analysis done by the media was superficial at best. If no operational â€oesmoking gun” could be found, the report still shows that Saddam Hussein had plenty of ties to all sorts of terrorist groups, including radical Islamist jihadis." um... we support radical islamists. saudi arabia? wahhabiyahs? anyone?]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/hotair.com/archives/2008/03/14/saddam-supported-at-least-two-al-qaeda-groups-pentagon Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:33:24 -0700 http://jackanapes.stumbleupon.com/review/18781438/ Jackanapes - From the page: "If no operational "smoking gun" could be found, the report still shows that Saddam Hussein had plenty of ties to all sorts of terrorist groups, including radical Islamist jihadis." Well now... Plenty of ties to terrorist groups.]]> http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/hotair.com/archives/2008/03/14/saddam-supported-at-least-two-al-qaeda-groups-pentagon