<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Demystifying the &quot;duplicate content penalty&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:31:30 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:02:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:38:08 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://torka.stumbleupon.com/review/25749013/</link>
<title>http://torka.stumbleupon.com/review/25749013/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>torka</b> - Google themselves finally debunk the idea of an automatic duplicate content penalty. Sweet.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:17:08 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://online-ethics.stumbleupon.com/review/25496895/</link>
<title>http://online-ethics.stumbleupon.com/review/25496895/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>online-ethics</b> - Duplicate content on a site is not grounds for action on that site unless it appears that the intent of the duplicate content is to be deceptive and manipulate search engine results. If your site suffers from duplicate content issues, and you don't follow the advice listed above, we do a good job of choosing a version of the content to show in our search results.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:30:50 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://septom.stumbleupon.com/review/25433339/</link>
<title>http://septom.stumbleupon.com/review/25433339/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>SEPTom</b> - Google on the "Duplicate Content Penalty"]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:53:52 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://devbasu.stumbleupon.com/review/25432319/</link>
<title>http://devbasu.stumbleupon.com/review/25432319/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>devbasu</b> - How to deal with dup. content - Advice from Google!]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:01:35 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://wikitechno.stumbleupon.com/review/25427973/</link>
<title>http://wikitechno.stumbleupon.com/review/25427973/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>wikitechno</b> - <i><b><font size="5" face="Times New Roman" color="#ff6600">Demystifying the &quot;duplicate content penalty&quot;</font>
<b><i>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate- content-penalty.html"><img width="400" height="400" alt="" src="http://www.ragepank.com/images/500/article-content/duplicate-content-2.gif" /></a></i></b></b></i>  

<b><i><font size="3" face="Verdana" color="#ffcc00">Duplicate content. There's just something about it. We keep writing about it, and people keep asking about it. In particular, I still hear a lot of webmasters worrying about whether they may have a &quot;duplicate content penalty.&quot;</font></i></b>]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:53:43 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://glseecann.stumbleupon.com/review/25354398/</link>
<title>http://glseecann.stumbleupon.com/review/25354398/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>glseecann</b> - Comprehensive article covering all aspects of the much discussed and worried about <b><font color="#ff0000">Google Duplicate Content Penalty</font> Issue</b> posted September 12, 2008. Webmasters of Blogs with Archive pages + many others should read this and possibly sleep easier.<br /><br />From the page: " In summary: Having duplicate content can affect your site in a variety of ways; but unless you've been duplicating deliberately, it's unlikely that one of those ways will be a penalty. "]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:48:48 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://technical-itch.stumbleupon.com/review/25338799/</link>
<title>http://technical-itch.stumbleupon.com/review/25338799/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/662/23713662.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>Technical-Itch</b> - The debate on duplicate content finally put to bed.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
