<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Official Google Blog: Using data to fight webspam</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-data-to-fight-webspam.html</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-data-to-fight-webspam.html on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:32:16 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:07:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-data-to-fight-webspam.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:40:08 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://socalsamba.stumbleupon.com/review/22914260/</link>
<title>http://socalsamba.stumbleupon.com/review/22914260/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/819/21387819.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>socalsamba</b> - From the page: "
As the head of the webspam team at Google, I'm in charge of making sure your search results are as relevant and informative as possible. Webspam, in case you've never heard of it, is the junk you see in search results when websites successfully cheat their way into higher positions in search results or otherwise violate search engine quality guidelines. If you've never seen webspam, here's a good example of what you might see if you click on a link in the search results that's spam (click on the image to see it larger)."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-data-to-fight-webspam.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
