<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of The Corner on National Review Online</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://corner.nationalreview.com/ on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:33:15 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:03:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:51:47 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://und1sk0.stumbleupon.com/review/33826187/</link>
<title>http://und1sk0.stumbleupon.com/review/33826187/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/421/2453421.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>und1sk0</b> - Hey look, its a site full of dipshit zionists and wingnuts!]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:32:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://lucyalex.stumbleupon.com/review/28264599/</link>
<title>http://lucyalex.stumbleupon.com/review/28264599/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/421/2453421.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>lucyalex</b> - From the page: "The Blithesome Banality of Blago's Blunders   [Jonah Goldberg]

The word "evil" has been used twice today in the Corner to describe Blago's crimes. I'm not really disputing the use of the word. But that's not really the word that comes to my mind. Evil is too dark, too serious, too smart for what we're talking about. I agree with Kathryn that there's something almost wholesome or nostalgic about Blogo's criminal misdeeds. He wasn't found opening an umbrella in parts of his anatomy for money on the internet, or giving cash to terrorists who were going to have Santas wear suicide-padding at department stores around the country. He didn't check interns for a hernia without permission or spy for the Norks. He's just a crook. A good, old-fashioned, crook. I know I'm supposed to be outraged, and in a certain sense I am. If he's guilty of all that's alleged, I hope they throw him in the stoney lonesome until the Chicago Cubs win the World Series or 2025, whichever comes second. But in another sense, this is just plain enjoyable. It's like when you watch "Cops" and the idiot burglar tries to hide beside a tree in the dark, even though he's wearing light-up sneakers. It's like when Dan Rather dares the world to prove he's a clueless ass-clown. It's just good stuff. There's no tragedy here. No wasted potential. No undeserving victims. No profound and complicated symbolic issues (I somewhat doubt the Serbian-American lobby is going to cry racism). This is the sort of criminality we want the Feds to find, particularly in Chicago. Everyone gets what they deserve - at least so far - and all of the guilty parties are all the more deserving of punishment because they don't quite understand what the big deal is. I love it."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:03:49 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://madcap-freedom.stumbleupon.com/review/5317284/</link>
<title>http://madcap-freedom.stumbleupon.com/review/5317284/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/421/2453421.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>madcap-freedom</b> - <br /><b><font size="4" color="red"><u><a rel="nofollow" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjIzYTg5ZjdmYzIyOWFkZGU3NzE4MGIzM zViMjAyMjY=" target="_blank">War Mongers At It Yet Again</a></u></font>

From the page: "Iran's barring access to weapons inspectors is the same as expelling them for all practical purposes unless the inspectors are allowed to continue inspecting immediately.  This is the warning flag.  

If this story is true, <font color="yellow"><i>we should bomb the facilities right now</i></font>.  Article 51 of the U.N. Charter preserves the right of self-defense in cases of armed aggression.  For Iran to hide a batch of LEU is not only a violation of the nonproliferation treaty, but also, strategically speaking, an act of armed aggression, because it is the last moment at which the scope of Iran's enrichment activities can be known with any certainty.   

<font color="yellow"><i><u>Assuming the story is true, if we don't attack now, the optimal window for self-defense will close</u> and any future military operation may have to be much more expansive in scope and would have a greatly diminished probability of success</i></font>."</b><center>
<img src="http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i58/madcap_freedom/Politicks/irannuke.jpg " alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting" /><br />
</center><b>Gotta give thumbs down on the war mongers here...
They just don't get it...

<font color="yellow"><i>"if we don't attack now, the optimal window for self-defense will close..."</i></font>

***madcap gives his head a shake and re-reads that line - again*** ...self-defense...? Wha'...?  

They have mislead us for 5+ years now...
Saddam Hussien, WMD, innocent life, hatred, stir-up-the-hornet's-nest theory, freedom agenda, attacks of September the eleventh, resentment, lack of hope, threats...

Don't any of these errors ring any bells for them...?<br /><br /></b>]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:54:30 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://horsetamer.stumbleupon.com/review/1985865/</link>
<title>http://horsetamer.stumbleupon.com/review/1985865/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/421/2453421.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>HorseTamer</b> - The blog as secret handshake: this house blog of the [respected] [arch] conservative (take your choice) magazine careens from mini-columns to cryptic links to in-jokes. It's hard to know what to make of it.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/corner.nationalreview.com</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
