<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Judge Orders YouTube to Give All User Histories to Viacom | Threat Level | Wired.com</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:43:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://aowreturns.stumbleupon.com/review/28544987/</link>
<title>http://aowreturns.stumbleupon.com/review/28544987/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>aowreturns</b> - From the page: "July 02, 2008"]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:14:20 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://yusdi.stumbleupon.com/review/23060935/</link>
<title>http://yusdi.stumbleupon.com/review/23060935/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>yusdi</b> - <i>"The judge also turned Google's own defense of its data retention policies -- that IP addresses of computers aren't personally revealing in and of themselves, against it to justify the log dump."</i><br /><br />Uhh... Why did you want the IP addresses again, Viacom?<br /><br />UPDATE: Google has asked Viacom <a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9983702-7.html">to allow them to anonymize users' data</a>:<br /><br /><i>"... We are asking Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court's order."</i><br /><br />UPDATE: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/212226/google-wins-agreement-to-anonymise-yout ube-logs.html">They got the permission</a>:<br /><br /><i>"Google claims it had now agreed to provide plaintiffs' attorneys with a version of a massive viewership database that blanks out YouTube usernames and IP addresses that could be used to identify individual video watchers."</i>]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:24:11 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://hekkawhat.stumbleupon.com/review/23372862/</link>
<title>http://hekkawhat.stumbleupon.com/review/23372862/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>hekkawhat</b> - Fuck you Viacom! Now stay off the internet!]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:57:34 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://djteka.stumbleupon.com/review/23266855/</link>
<title>http://djteka.stumbleupon.com/review/23266855/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>djTeka</b> - So we are in the wrong for wanting to see shows that we don't have the time to wait to see on TV, before Viacom takes down the video?
<center>
Edit:<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.neatorama.com/2008/07/07/who-owns-what-on-television/?%2F" target="_blank"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2008-07/tv-viacom2.gif" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by Neatorama" /></a></center>

Viacom, if I want to watch old Nickelodeon 
(or whatever tickles your fancy [that Viacom happens to own]) 
shows, but you don't provide them, what do I do?
Wait until you care?
No.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:43:14 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://sarahbliss.stumbleupon.com/review/23209379/</link>
<title>http://sarahbliss.stumbleupon.com/review/23209379/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>sarahbliss</b> - Absolutely fucking nuts.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:46:52 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://jebi-of-eq2.stumbleupon.com/review/23188775/</link>
<title>http://jebi-of-eq2.stumbleupon.com/review/23188775/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>Jebi-of-eq2</b> - fuck viacom.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:00:25 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://m-104.stumbleupon.com/review/23174728/</link>
<title>http://m-104.stumbleupon.com/review/23174728/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/325/21507325.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>M-104</b> - Simply creepy. I'm probably not alone in mistrusting our large telecom corporations - especially since this wonderful business of unwarranted wiretapping - but for Viacom to demand <i>users' IP addresses</i> (and read toward the article's end for their <i>really</i> unreasonable demands) is a legal overreaction at best. At worst, this could be something a little darker than a copyright dispute.]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/judge-orders-yo.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
