<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>StumbleUpon | Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of Kazaa downloads cost one man $750 per song in RIAA suit - Ars Technica</title>
<link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man-750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html</link>
<description>Comments &amp;#38; Reviews of http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man-750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html on StumbleUpon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:07:49 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:17:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
<atom:link href="http://rss.stumbleupon.com/url/arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man-750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:49:32 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://dannyandnina.stumbleupon.com/review/18905273/</link>
<title>http://dannyandnina.stumbleupon.com/review/18905273/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/978/18526978.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>DannyAndNina</b> - The RIAA was awarded $23,250, or $750 in statutory damages for each of the 31 songs named in the lawsuit, plus $420 in court costs. Judge Gilmore took issue with Anderson's argument that the damages sought by the RIAA were excessive. "Yet, the true cost of Defendant's harms in distributing Plaintiffs' Copyrighted Recordings for download by other users on KaZaA is incalculable," wrote the judge in her opinion. "That is, there is no way to ascertain the precise amount of damages caused by the Defendant's actions."

<a rel="nofollow" href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man -750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html"><img border="0" width="200" height="200" src="http://media.arstechnica.com/news.media/riaalogo.jpg" /></a>]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man-750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:07:46 -0700</pubDate>
<link>http://ciscomatisse.stumbleupon.com/review/18885658/</link>
<title>http://ciscomatisse.stumbleupon.com/review/18885658/</title>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.stumble-upon.com/thumb/978/18526978.jpg" length="" type="image/jpeg" />
<description><![CDATA[<b>CiscoMatisse</b> - "The RIAA was awarded $23,250, or $750 in statutory damages for each of the 31 songs named in the lawsuit, plus $420 in court costs. Judge Gilmore took issue with Anderson's argument that the damages sought by the RIAA were excessive. "Yet, the true cost of Defendant's harms in distributing Plaintiffs' Copyrighted Recordings for download by other users on KaZaA is incalculable," wrote the judge in her opinion. "That is, there is no way to ascertain the precise amount of damages caused by the Defendant's actions."]]></description>
<comments>http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-kazaa-downloads-cost-one-man-750-per-song-in-riaa-suit.html</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
